Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Tory royal yacht anger

Saturday 27 September 1997 23:02 BST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

The Government is coming under pressure to clarify the future of the royal yacht Britannia.

A senior Government source has confirmed that proposals to refit or replace the vessel have been abandoned in a decision taken jointly with the Queen. The news provoked outrage among Tories, who were equally angry at the way the decision became public through "leaks".

The Prime Minister refused to take questions on the yacht as he arrived in Brighton on Friday for the Labour Party conference. But the shadow defence secretary, Sir George Young, called on the Defence Secretary, George Robertson, to confirm the position officially.

The decision on Britannia is clearly a result of the Queen's acceptance that a royal yacht is an anachronism for a modern Royal Family.

A Government source said the Treasury could not escape the fact that either a refitted Britannia or a new vessel would cost pounds 12m a year to run. The source said: "From our point of view, it was about saving money, but I think they [Buckingham Palace] were relieved about it."

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in