Tobacco `victims' unable to sue
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.A GROUP of lung-cancer sufferers was yesterday refused permission to sue two tobacco companies.
High Court judge Mr Justice Wright decided not to exercise his power to allow the action against Gallaher and Imperial Tobacco to continue after it was brought outside the legal time limit. The plaintiffs in eight test cases had lodged their claims more than three years after being diagnosed with lung cancer, one missing the time limitation by 24 years.
They had asked the judge to exercise his discretion under the 1980 Limitations Act to allow the action to proceed but in a judgment at the High Court sitting in Liverpool he refused that application.
Mr Justice Wright said: "The conclusion I have arrived at in each case is that it would not be appropriate for me to exercise my discretion to allow the cases to continue. Each of the applications must be refused."
Had it been successful, the application would have paved the way for a larger group of lung-cancer sufferers, who lodged claims more than three years after diagnosis, to sue the two firms. Now, 14 sufferers of an original group of 52 will proceed with compensation claims against the firms in a trial due next year.
After the judgment was handed down, Martyn Day and Irwin Mitchell, the solicitors representing the plaintiffs, issued a joint statement. "Obviously many clients will be disappointed ... We now have to consider this very carefully to determine how next to proceed."
A Gallaher spokesman said: "We were always confident we would get this judgment. We clearly welcome it."
The lung-cancer sufferers had claimed at an earlier hearing at the High Court in London that the eight suffered injury because all the cigarettes with which they were supplied between the 1950s and 1970s contained far more tar than was reasonably safe or appropriate.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments