The `typical viewer' no longer exists
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.THE DEMISE of "the typical viewer" was declared yesterday. After decades of broadcasters drawing up schedules to appeal to the typical viewer, they now accept that there is no such animal.
The end came with little fuss in a lengthy report for the BBC drawn up by the management consultants ECON, who examined the prospects for BBC digital services. In a survey of the viewing habits of more than 1,300 people it emerged that there were virtually no common strands that could define viewers as a group. Asked which genres of television they watched - such as sport, films, news, drama etc - the respondents registered 846 different combinations.
The most popular genres were films, watched by choice by 79 per cent of respondents, news by 70 per cent, light entertainment and comedy by 62 per cent and factual programmes by 61 per cent. Arts and music programmes are watched by only 34 per cent of viewers, according to the survey, children's programmes by 16.8 per cent and programmes for minority groups by 7 per cent.
On the diversity of viewing habits, the report said: "This clearly demonstrates that there is no such thing as a `typical' viewer ... Most viewers are interested in a range of programming, and this range differs widely between people."
The report adds that it would be wrong to suppose that there are "types" of viewers whose needs can be met by targeted programming.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments