The truth behind tragedy of Child B
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.VENOMOUS disagreements between the cancer specialists involved in the care of Child B, the 10-year-old girl who became the centre of worldwide media attention after the National Health Service refused to fund a second bone-marrow transplant for her leukaemia, are revealed in a report published today.
The first detailed study of the case, which was presented as the worst example of NHS rationing when it occurred in 1995, shows a bitter dispute between the paediatricians who felt she should be allowed to die in peace and the adult leukaemia specialists prepared to buy more time at any cost.
Child B, later identified as Jaymee Bowen, who died in May 1996, won the hearts of millions when she was shown on a BBC Panorama programme in October 1995 delivering a crushing riposte to the managers of Cambridge Health Authority for refusing to fund the pounds 75,000 cost of her extra treatment.
"Thank you for nothing. Because now look at me, I'm fine. You could have paid for it. You had the chance and you blew it,'' she said.
The report, published by the King's Fund, says: "The central issue was less to do with finance than what care was appropriate for a child with Jaymee's medical history." The paediatricians at Addenbrooke's hospital, Cambridge, and the Royal Marsden in London attacked the "maverick medicine" practised at Hammersmith hospital and the private Portman clinic in London, where she was finally treated, saying that they were prepared to go ahead whatever the human cost. The adult specialists in turn castigated the "paediatric mafia" with their conservative and inflexible attitudes.
Jaymee's last days, page 16
Leading article, page 18
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments