Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

The pounds 130,000 man who will decide how much Britain's poorest must earn

Barrie Clement
Monday 02 June 1997 23:02 BST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

The Government yesterday came under pressure to introduce a national minimum wage within a year by the new head of the Low Pay Commission, who admitted it could cost jobs.

Professor George Bain, whose appointment was announced yesterday, said he hoped a rate would be fixed by next summer, thereby looking to bounce the Government into an early decision. The pounds 130,000 a year principal of the London Business School revealed that ministers wanted the commission to complete their deliberations in 12 months, but said it could recommend a minimum by next April that could be made law within months.

The Government's favoured timetable is for the statutory limit to come into force later. Senior union leaders were told before the election it may not be introduced until early 1999.

Professor Bain refused to be drawn on a figure, but said there should be a balance between the aspirations of unions and employers. While companies would prefer a rate near pounds 3 an hour, unions are seeking a figure of more than pounds 4.

The 58-year-old Canadian-born academic said the rate should be struck at a level to help the low paid, but which would have a minimal effect on jobs. "It will be a difficult task, but not impossible. I would be surprised if there were not some job losses, but the question is whether those jobs would be better lost anyway."

The commission's task would be to conduct research and soundings among interested parties before advising on a figure. Professor Bain, a respected industrial relations specialist, said his experience as an arbitrator and mediator in labour disputes would be invaluable.

Potentially there were both negative and positive effects of a national minimum wage. It could lead to pressure from high paid workers to maintain differentials, but it could also have a positive impact by reducing staff turnover, increasing productivity, and providing a stimulus to more training, he said. Evidence was emerging in the US that showed a minimum wage in the catering industry led to job creation.

Professor Bain, whose appointment was welcomed by trade unions, has been careful not to identify himself with one political party. He discloses that he has voted at one time or another for all three main parties.

His involvement with industrial relations began 30 years ago at Nuffield College, Oxford, where he conducted research into white collar trade unionism. A former head of Warwick University's industrial relations department and business school, he also sat on the Donovan Royal Commission on trade unions and employers' bodies and the Prices and Incomes Board in the 1960s. As a member of the governing council of the Advisory Conciliation and Arbitration Service, he has won the respect of trade unionists.

However, he also has a reputation as tough-minded pragmatist. He argued for a six- figure salary when he applied for the job at LBS in the late 1980s on the grounds that they had to offer the same earnings as the best such institutions if they were to compete internationally.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in