The day a `habitual liar' met a `politician on the make'
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.FRESH ALLEGATIONS of corruption were laid against the former Tory minister Neil Hamilton yesterday, who was described in the High Court as an "unscrupulous and greedy politician ... on the make and on the take".
On the opening day of his libel action against Mohamed Al Fayed, the millionaire owner of Harrods, a jury was told how Mr Hamilton tried to change the law for the benefit of the multinational Mobil Oil and then demanded pounds 10,000 for his efforts.
The former MP for Tatton allegedly misled the Deputy Prime Minister at the time, Michael Heseltine; the Cabinet Secretary, Sir Robin Butler; the Tory Chief Whip, Richard Ryder; and the Parliamentary Commissioner, Sir Gordon Downey, when questioned about the payment.
George Carman QC, for Mr Fayed, told the court that Mobil Oil was "flabbergasted, embarrassed and shocked" to receive the demand for money from Mr Hamilton.
At a meeting in October 1994, five days after allegations appeared in newspapers of Mr Hamilton receiving cash and other benefits from Mr Fayed in return for asking parliamentary questions on his behalf, the MP for Tatton was questioned by Mr Heseltine, Sir Robin and Mr Ryder.
The MP denied the allegations and did not disclose that he had tried to move an amendment during the committee stage of the Finance Bill, which would have saved the oil industry pounds 77m that year.
Subsequently Mr Hamilton was also questioned by the Parliamentary Commissioner about claims that he had asked questions on behalf of Mobil. Mr Hamilton again denied it, without revealing his part in moving an amendment to clause 116 of the 1989 Finance Bill.
Mr Carman also told the jury about how Mr Hamilton had accepted cash in brown envelopes from Mr Fayed, thousands of pounds in Harrods gift vouchers and free luxury holidays.
But Desmond Browne QC, for Mr Hamilton, said Mr Fayed was a "phoney Pharaoh" who would be buried by the sheer bulk of his lies.
"Mr Fayed, we say, is a classic Jekyll and Hyde figure - a man with a jovial side, a man with a thoroughly evil side."
He went on: "Mr Fayed is a habitual liar. He is a deeply vindictive man, a man ready to take his revenge on those who he sees as responsible for exposing the lies he tells."
Mr Hamilton is suing Mr Fayed and the Channel 4 programme Dispatches for libel over claims that he took money and gifts in return for asking parliamentary questions.
The case continues.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments