Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

'Terrorists' lose appeal in Yemen

Jane Hughes
Saturday 25 September 1999 23:02 BST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

THE EIGHT British Muslims found guilty of an alleged bombing plot in Yemen had their appeal rejected yesterday.

Five of the men, including the 17-year-old son of radical London cleric Abu Hamza, are now in Yemeni prisons serving between three and seven years for their alleged involvement in an Islamic fundamentalist plot to bomb British targets in Aden.

The other three were sentenced to time already served awaiting trial, though two of those, Shaz Nabi, 20, and Ayad Hussein, 24, from Birmingham, have remained in custody. Yesterday, the judge ordered the release of the two men; the third, Ghulam Hussein, 25, from Luton, has been on bail because of ill health.

The rejection of the appeal was immediately challenged by defence lawyer Rashad Yaqoob, of the human rights organisation, the Legal Studies Institute. Mr Yaqoob said the defendants had appealed to the Supreme Court on the grounds that their action was taken in time.

"From a legal point of view it is outrageous, and from a human rights point of view it is disappointing," he said. "We understand they are saying that the appeal was out of time because it was not within 15 days of the judgment. That is a completely absurd proposal, because in all Yemeni courts the appeal time runs from the point of receiving the judgment. The court didn't give them a copy of the judgment until after the 15-day period had elapsed, and the application was made within 15 days of the copy being received."

A Foreign Office spokesman said the judge had rejected a prosecution appeal for the same reason, adding that both sides had 40 days to appeal to the Supreme Court and intended to do so.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in