Telephone prices to rise by up to 20%
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.British Telecom is to raise the prices of telephones and fax machines by up to 20 per cent, following a ruling by the industry regulator, Oftel, that it was unfairly subsidising equipment sales.
BT said the price of an ordinary phone would rise by about pounds 5, a cordless model by pounds 10 and a middle-range fax machine by pounds 45.
The Oftel ruling followed complaints from other equipment manufacturers that BT unfairly priced its products in the pounds 1bn a year telecoms equipment sector. BT denied it was engaging in cross-subsidisation, but said it had announced the price increases to comply with the ruling "as quickly as possible".
Don Cruikshank, Oftel's director-general, said: "Oftel has been investigating complaints from a number of BT's competitors about the supply of telephones, answering machines and fax machines in the domestic and small business market.
"I have concluded that BT's supply of such equipment in the wholesale market and from BT shops and other retail channels is unfairly subsidised."
Oftel conceded that the immediate effect of BT's response to the ruling would be to raise prices for consumers. But in the long run, consumer choice would be protected by ensuring that competitors operated on a level playing field with BT.
Share issues, page 18
Comment, page 19
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments