Tearful Modahl given four-year ban
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Shock waves registered throughout athletics yesterday as Diane Modahl was banned from competition for four years after being found guilty of a doping offence by the British Athletic Federation disciplinary committee.
Modahl, speaking clearly despite brimming tears, announced she would appeal against the decision by taking it to an independent panel which will also be convened by BAF. Should that prove unsuccessful, she will continue to try to clear her name. "I am horrified at this decision and at the prospect of the nightmare of the last four months continuing," she said.
But the unanimous conclusion by a five-strong panel, including three former international athletes, constitutes a damning verdict on the former Commonwealth Games 800 metres champion. No previous British athlete has appealed successfully against a dopingban.
It will also have dismayed many figures within British athletics, including Linford Christie, Sally Gunnell and the team doctor, Malcolm Brown, who have gone out of their way to support her.
There was surprise too within the International Amateur Athletic Federation, which had reserved its right to question any British verdict in Modahl's favour. "I am quite frankly staggered at the Federation verdict, given the way Modahl has been portrayedand how vitriolically she has been defended by Malcolm Brown, Linford Christie and so many others," the IAAF spokesman, Christopher Winner, said. "This is devastating. If she can take drugs after the way she has been depicted then we are in real trouble."
Contrary to widespread speculation, Modahl's lawyers did not argue that the abnormally high level of testosterone shown up in her urine sample at a meeting in Lisbon on 18 June this year resulted from a medical condition.
"Scientific experts have concluded that although Diane does have two medical conditions which do not affect her general health, they would not have had a material effect on the case," Modahl's solicitor, Tony Morton-Hooper, said.
Her defence, he said, had rested primarily on the way her sample was handled and analysed by the Lisbon testing laboratory. Her advisers also registered "grace concern" that all the evidence from Lisbon had not been made available.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments