Tagging scheme to be extended
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Trials of electronic tags for criminals are to be extended for a third time because the courts have refused to place enough offenders under "house arrest". Since the tags were launched in July 1995, only 325 offenders have faced a curfew order monitored by electronic tags, which is far less that officials had predicted.
The Home Office is understood to be preparing to extend the trials, currently held in Reading, Norfolk, and Manchester, for a further year and expand the catchment areas. Harry Fletcher, of the National Association of Probation Officers, said the tagging experiment had been a catalogue of failures. "They are now looking to tag fine defaulters and others for whom it will serve no purpose," he said.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments