Surrogate mother lied about abortion
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.A surrogate mother who was believed to have aborted a baby she was carrying for a Dutch couple admitted last night that she was still pregnant.
Karen Roche, a 31-year-old maternity nurse and a mother-of-two, confessed she did not undergo the abortion she claimed took place on 8 April.
Sonja and Clemens Peeters, the couple who paid her a reported pounds 12,000 to carry the baby, said last night: "We are totally shocked and stunned."
The revelation came just two days after Mrs Roche, from Scarborough, North Yorkshire, claimed she aborted the baby because she did not think they were committed to the pregnancy.
The Peeters, who had been trying to have a baby for 10 years and had looked to Britain to avoid the strict laws in the Netherlands, claimed to be "emotionally wrecked" after the deal collapsed. Mr Peeters, whose wife suffered five miscarriages and had 16 unsuccessful attempts at artificial insemination said: "We were left with nothing in the end except an empty feeling and our child has gone."
Mrs Roche, the biological mother, claimed to have had an abortion in April at a private clinic in London after the Peeters reportedly failed to turn up to three meetings to discuss the child's future. On Monday, she said: "I felt they weren't committed to myself and my pregnancy and felt it was in everyone's best interests to terminate the child."
The couple were introduced to Mrs Roche by the surrogacy pioneer Kim Cotton in January in London and agreed a fee. But the Dutch couple said Mrs Roche's mood changed after she became pregnant in February.
The (now fictitious) abortion prompted Mrs Cotton to halt the process by which couples from abroad are linked up with British surrogate mothers.
Matthew Brace
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments