Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Surcharge on motorists to pay NHS cost

Lucy Baker
Thursday 05 August 1999 23:02 BST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

MOTORISTS ARE to be hit by big increases in their car insurance premiums after the Government's decision to claw back the cost of NHS treatment for road accident victims.

The Royal & Sun Alliance insurance firm confirmed yesterday that it is increasing motor insurance premiums for its British customers by up to 17 per cent in response to the decision. The increase would mean that the average motor premium would go up from pounds 400 a year to pounds 468.

Royal & Sun's chief executive, Bob Mendelsohn, said motor claims costs were rising in double-digit amounts because of a government Bill introduced last April.

The warning came just 24 hours after a rival insurer, Norwich Union, announced that it will increase its premiums by up to 15 per cent.

The Association of British Insurers estimates that the total bill to the UK insurance industry will be pounds 100m.

The legislation, outlined in the Queen's Speech, substantially increased the maximum amount the NHS could claim back from insurers for treating road accident victims.

Under the old rules, announced in Labour's first Budget in July 1997, the NHS could recoup a maximum of pounds 2,949 for in-patient treatment and up to pounds 295 for out-patients. But since the introduction of the new legislation, the maximum amount that can be claimed for in-patients has soared to pounds 10,000 and out-patient rates have been changed to a flat charge of pounds 354.

The NHS is also becoming more efficient at pursuing insurers for the cost of treating road accident victims. Before the April legislation, the health service claimed only 15 per cent of its entitlement.

The Automobile Association reacted strongly yesterday to the news of the insurers' comments, saying innocent motorists were again being hit by the Government.

An AA spokeswoman said it had estimated last year that the average driver would pay another pounds 10 on a pounds 260 policy - or less than 5 per cent - to cover the cost of the changes to claiming back for treatment. "This is more than we estimated so once again innocent motorists are going to get hit," she said.

"It will be the law-abiding motorists who buy insurance who will be worst off. Someone who falls off a ladder in their home is treated in hospital without their house insurer being billed, so why should it happen to the car driver?"

The RAC Foundation said that the comments made by the insurers had confirmed its fears that there would be "significant" hikes in insurance costs.

A spokesman said: "We said that it was unfairly discriminatory against motorists and it still is."

The spokesman added that during the consultation process, the RAC was given to understand by the Government and the insurers that the costs would not be passed on to motorists through higher premiums: "Lo and behold - the insurers are saying we will have to pay higher premiums. I smell a rat."

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in