`Sun' is forced to say sorry again
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.THE SUN's decision to publish half-naked pictures of Sophie Rhys- Jones was last night described as "reprehensible" in a scathing attack from the newspaper complaints body.
David Yelland, the paper's editor, was forced to make a second apology, following publication of an apology in last Thursday's Sun, before Buckingham Palace agreed to draw a line under the matter.
Lord Wakeham, chairman of the Press Complaints Commission (PCC), issued a stern statement warning that "such a mistake must not happen again".
He added: "The newspaper's apology [following publication of the picture] in no way excuses the grave error which was made, nor lessens the distress which it caused Miss Rhys-Jones.
"The decision to publish these pictures was reprehensible and such a mistake must not happen again. In particular, I want to make clear that Miss Rhys-Jones should enjoy the same rights to respect for her personal life ... as anyone else."
The complaint of "unjust invasion of privacy" made by the Queen's communications secretary, Simon Lewis, last Wednesday, was the main item at the PCC meeting yesterday.
After the meeting, Lord Wakeham explained that the royal family had agreed to a resolution of the matter following a further apology from The Sun.
"As far as the formal complaint is concerned, Buckingham Palace has indicated to me today that this statement, together with the newspaper's own statement later this afternoon, resolves the issues they raised with us.
"There is therefore no remaining complaint on which the PCC will need to formally adjudicate."
Mr Yelland's own statement accepted the PCC's conclusion and reiterated his apology formally, if somewhat defiantly.
He said: "I made it clear last Thursday that I deeply regret the publication of intrusive photographs of Sophie Rhys-Jones and the distress caused to her," he said.
Obviously weary of the intense backlash to last Wednesday's publication, he added: "There will be no more comment on this matter which I now consider to be closed."
The Palace said: "Prince Edward and Miss Rhys-Jones, having seen the statement from the Press Complaints Commission and the further apology from The Sun, have confirmed that they will not be pursuing a formal complaint against the newspaper."
The PCC spokesman, Luke Chauveau, insisted that readers should not feel the tabloid had been let off lightly.
"What do they want - blood? The public does not always appreciate that it is a very serious matter for an editor to make a public apology. The main thing is that the complainant is happy. Miss Rhys-Jones can now get married without this matter hanging over her."
Last night Lord Wakeham was insistent that self-regulation of newspapers continued to be a satisfactory and successful option.
"This regrettable episode - which I have to say no conceivable privacy law could ever have prevented - does not detract from that in any way."
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments