Straw under fire on secrecy
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.JACK STRAW will come under intense pressure to toughen up his freedom of information Bill this week when a committee of MPs publishes a highly critical report on the Government's legislation.
The all-party Commons Public Administration Committee will condemn the Home Secretary's decision to water down the Government's original proposals and call for him to make a much greater commitment to openness.
Although Mr Straw has already indicated his readiness to make some concessions to his critics, the report, which is due to be published on Thursday, is expected to highlight a number of areas in which the MPs still find his position unacceptable.
They are furious that the Government is determined for ministers to have the final say on whether or not they release information.
The MPs believe that the new commissioner for freedom of information should be given the power to order departments to hand over documents.
The committee, which is headed by the Labour MP Tony Wright, a long-standing advocate of greater openness, is also expected to criticise the number of areas that are exempted in the draft Bill.
Those areas include policy advice given to ministers by their officials and information about accidents or disasters.
During his evidence to the MPs, the Home Secretary indicated that he was ready to reconsider the scope of the exemptions.
But the MPs believe that there are also basic principles that need to be reassessed. They are convinced that the Home Secretary, by giving ministers and civil servants the right to veto the release of documents, has failed to subscribe to the principle of freedom of information.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments