Storm over `port' delays trade deal
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.A DISPUTE over South Africa's right to sell its fortified wines at home as "port" and "sherry" is threatening a ground- breaking trade deal with the European Union.
The Europeans are demanding that South African vintners stop using the names "sherry" and "port" for their fortified wines, saying that only Spain can produce wines called sherry and only the Portuguese city of Oporto can label its fortified wine as port.
After a direct appeal from the South African President, Nelson Mandela, fell on deaf ears at a meeting of foreign ministers on Monday, the issue will now go to the Vienna summit of EU heads of government this weekend.
The wrangle is embarrassing to the European Commission as a deal was supposed to have been reached at the Cardiff summit at the end of Britain's presidency of the EU in June.
Instead, when President Mandela arrived he was promised an agreement by autumn, a deadline now extended to Christmas. In his plea to EU heads of government, Mr Mandela argued: "South Africa's economic success is by no means guaranteed and requires an immense effort."
After four years of talks the outline of a deal to phase out duties on about 90 per cent of EU-South Africa trade, worth $19bn (pounds 11.5bn) a year, was struck last month at talks in Pretoria.
South Africa claims the terms port and sherry have been in wide use for 300 years, but has agreed to a compromise under which it would stop using them on exports to Europe and phase them out over five to 10 years in other foreign markets.
But South Africa insists it must be allowed to continue marketing fortified wines as port and sherry at home and in neighbouring nations with which it has trade agreements.
"For the ordinary population the agreement cannot be concluded by us surrendering the household names in southern Africa of our own port and sherry," Mr Mandela wrote in his appeal.
The row is particularly embarrassing because of the small scale of trade involved. Sales of South African "port" and "sherry" are worth only about 750m rand (pounds 76m), of which 13 per cent comes from exports.
An EU official said last week: "We are talking about one of the new democracies. They have agreed to phase out the terms for Europe. Are we going to resist for such a petty reason?"
But others say the Europeans have compromised enough and that the entire package is preferential for South Africa. Mr Mandela was banking on public sympathy for South Africa to extract another concession, a diplomat argued.
Subscribe to Independent Premium to bookmark this article
Want to bookmark your favourite articles and stories to read or reference later? Start your Independent Premium subscription today.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments