Stores defend 'strange fruit'
Appliance of science: Concern over role of genetics in health and commerce
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.The Sainsbury and Safeway supermarket chains said yesterday they were not worried by the prospect of consumers boycotting their tomato puree, made from genetically engineered tomatoes.
Puree from the modified tomatoes, developed by the drug company Zeneca, will be sold in the supermarkets from February. It will be the same price as the normal puree and will be stocked next to it. The puree will also be clearly labelled as being produced from genetically engineered fruit.
Both supermarkets said they were producing leaflets to inform the consumer and to counter the image of "Frankenstein's tomato".
David Cox, spokesman for Sainsbury's, said their primary aim was to offer the consumer a choice. "There are obvious benefits to genetically engineered food, such as enhanced taste and longer shelf-life."
The tomato has been engineered to last longer by slowing down the action of an enzyme which rots the fruit.More of the natural thickening agent pectin is retained.
The notion of "Frankenstein's tomato" was resurrected by Prince Charles on Tuesday night, on the eve of a seminar on Britain's disappearing biodiversity.
He said many people saw genetic engineering as the most promising way forward for agriculture, but his heart sank at the prospect of some of the new crops being planned.
His views were backed by Professor Tim Lang, from the Centre for Food Policy at Thames Valley University. "My view is that the principle is right but it's a big step . . . and yet the consumer is only being asked their views at the end."
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments