Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

South Africa's big firms oppose tax on past profits

Mary Braid
Monday 17 November 1997 00:02 GMT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

South African companies are being asked to pay for the past in the form of a wealth tax or training levy, following a three-day hearing at which business was called to account for its part in apartheid.

If the special Truth and Reconciliation Commission hearings - marked by a disappointing stream of qualified apologies from the corporate sector - are anything to go by, few businesses are likely to throw open willingly their coffers.

Archbishop Desmond Tutu, TRC chairman, opened the hearings by singling out the Shell and BP oil companies for criticism because they failed to make individual submissions. "No one today admits to supporting apartheid," said the archbishop. Trade union leader Sam Shilowa wryly said, it seemed everyone was a freedom fighter now.

The biggest corporations insisted they had long opposed apartheid, although some admitted they had not always done all they could. Some, like Anglo American and the Chamber of Mines, even suggested that business had been an apartheid victim, as the system reduced growth rates and barred South African companies from the international market. Johan Rupert, son of Anton Rupert, founder of Rembrandt, the largest Afrikaner business group, said he failed to understand how his company had benefited from apartheid.

At the end of the hearings, Koosum Kalyan, Shell SA's general manager, said no one from Shell had testified at the TRC hearings in Johannesburg because they were not invited to do so.

The archbishop's public criticism suggests behind-the-scenes tensions between the Commission and the oil multinationals, but Ms Kalyan said Shell had been told it could still lodge a written submission before 16 December, and discussions with the TRC were ongoing.

Ms Kalyan said that while Shell was already heavily involved in South Africa's transformation, the company would consider contributing to a special reparations fund for apartheid victims.

Since President Nelson Mandela took power, an informal system of compensation has been in operation. The President, who has made friends with white business leaders, regularly invites corporate giants to fund and build clinics and schools bearing their names. It would be a short-sighted captain of industry who turned down the opportunity of speedy rehabilitation.

But newspaper editors, academics and trade unionists are asking for a more systematic approach to compensation.

Former president PW Botha has told the Truth Commission that he will ignore a subpoena to testify about his role under apartheid. Archbishop Tutu warned yesterday that his defiance could land him in jail.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in