Social Services: Adoption procedures criticised
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Local authorities are providing a poor quality adoption service, a report revealed yesterday.
Inspections of seven local authorities by the Social Services Inspectorate found the adoption process is littered with avoidable delays, poor management and monitoring. The report - For Children's Sake Part II: An Inspection of Local Authority Post Placement and Post-Adoption Services - documents the radical changes in the needs of children placed for adoption over the last decade.
The agency's chief inspector, Sir Herbert Laming, said adoption services must be improved so that adopted children and adults get the service they deserve.
"The findings of recent inspections in seven local authorities raise questions about whether social services departments are responding to the challenges presented by adoption."
Delays in the adoption process, post-adoption support for adoptive and birth families, services for adopted adults, and a lack of commitment to inter-country adoption are the key issues which need to be addressed, he said.
Paul Boateng, Under-Secretary of State for Health, said the findings of the report must be addressed as a matter of urgency.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments