Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.THE MASSACHUSETTS appeal court verdict that allowed Louise Woodward to go free was immediately hailed and damned in equal measure by Americans, who have taken almost as close an interest in the case as Britons.
First responses came on numerous discussion and opinion sites set up on the internet, where writers argued passionately for and against Ms Woodward.
"Good riddance" and "may she rot" competed with a more sympathetic "I have always believed in your innocence". A substantial third group said that whether or not Ms Woodward was innocent, it was time to lay the whole affair to rest.
Some of these were grudging: "So you got away with it", others more generous: "Let her go home ... The justice system did what it was designed to do."
Then there were those who wanted her to return for quite different reasons: "Better to let her go. We have enough murderers here and why should our taxpayers pay to keep her in jail?"
Many saw the judgment as a comment on American justice. "Why have a jury?" was a frequent comment, alluding to the fact that the trial judge had overruled the jury's murder verdict.
This was also the direction taken by US legal analysts, whose instant assessments were solicited by America's numerous radio and television talk shows. CNN's resident legal specialist, Roger Cossack, said that Ms Woodward might have been "very lucky" but "justice, I believe, was done and the matter is over".
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments