Sleeper reprieve may slow rail privatisation
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.The Government's plans to privatise the railways before the next general election were in danger of becoming bogged down in a legal quagmire yesterday after a Scottish judge forced British Rail to abandon plans to axe the London to Fort William sleeper.
Lord Kirkwood ruled in Edinburgh's Court of Session that BR's decision to end the Fort William sleeper service on 26 May was unlawful because it provided the only trains on sections of line in the Glasgow area.
BR intended to run regular "ghost" trains late at night on the lines to ensure that technically they were still open. However, Lord Kirkwood accepted the argument by the Highland Regional Council, which mounted the challenge, that this was a "sham" and managers had failed to follow statutory line-closure procedures.
It was the first challenge to a closure under the Railways Act 1993, the legislation for privatising rail services, and its success suggests any other attempts to reduce services by BR or new private operators will be similarly challenged, adding to the already considerable uncertainty over rail privatisation.
If Lord Kirkwood's decision is upheld in the higher courts, it will mean that the proposal will have to be submitted to full public consultation, which takes about a year. In the meantime, the service must continue, he said, because the "ghost" trains did not amount to a service.
The plan to cut the service, along with Motorail services and the sleeper to Carlisle, emerged last December when Roger Salmon, the franchising director for the railways, announced that he would not be providing subsidy for these services when he took responsibility for allocating government support for rail services.
Mr Salmon said yesterday that the closure of the service was a matter for the BR board and Scotrail.
BR had argued it would have saved more than £2.5m a year by cutting the overnight service on the West Highland line but the line's supporters have said that the subsidy is much less.
Scotrail, which runs BR's Scottish service, says it will be plunged into a financial crisis if it has to operate the service without being bailed out by the British Rail board. Last night, BR said it would appeal but admitted it would be taking reservations for the service for journeys after 26 May.
Save our sleeper, page 21
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments