Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Skye bridge toll is 'lawful'

Saturday 09 March 1996 00:02 GMT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

The controversial tolls for crossing the Skye bridge are lawful, a court ruled yesterday.

Sheriff James Fraser rejected the argument of protesters charged with alleged non-payment of the pounds 4.30 toll as some 70 protesters packed the tiny courtroom in Dingwall, Highland, to hear his ruling on legal arguments against the charge.

The group, led by a piper and carrying banners and waving flags, had marched to the courthouse through the town.

Neil Murray QC, for the 180 people facing charges of non-payment of the pounds 4.30 toll, had earlier argued that the charge was incompetent under several statutory rules. He claimed the New Roads and Streets Act 1991, under which the tolls were charged, was contrary to the 1707 Treaty of Union andalso argued that the Secretary of State for Scotland was acting beyond his powers in introducing the toll order in 1992.

Sheriff Fraser ruled in favour of the Crown in test cases against three of the accused, and refused the defence immediate right to appeal.

Following a short adjournment the court then read the names of all 184 accused, with the majority maintaining their not guilty pleas. The trial of the first, George Anderson, will take place on 11 April.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in