Six Days of Accusation and Counter-claim: How the Story of a Tragic Error Unfolded
War In The Balkans
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Wednesday 14 April, 3.53pm: Belgrade claims Nato missiles hit a refugee convoy in Kosovo, killing 64 people and wounding 20 in two attacks. 'We have no information about these reports,' says the Nato spokesman, Jamie Shea.
Wednesday, 6.06pm: Nato sources unofficially admit their aircraft were in the area. By 7pm Nato says: 'We can confirm we attacked a military convoy in the area.' Jamie Shea later says: 'Nato doesn't attack civilian targets, full-stop.'
Wednesday, 8.05pm: Tony Blair says: 'We cannot take at face value any claim made by the Serb authorities.' An hour later, the Pentagon says that there was an 'indication' that Serbs attacked the convoy.
Thursday, 8am:
Nato says civilian casualties may have occurred after planes attacked a convoy of vehicles. By 11am the Foreign Secretary, Robin Cook, says: 'It is not possible to guarantee there will be no civilian casualties.'
Thursday, 12.30pm: Nato admits one of its planes mistakenly bombed a refugee convoy. By 2pm it gives details of a 'tragic accident' and plays a recorded interview with a US F-16 pilot. By Sunday, it says the recording 'may be unrelated'.
Yesterday:
Nato provides what it says is a full account of the bombing. It admits to intelligence failure and provides graphic details to show its pilots were involved in numerous air strikes. Concedes there could have been civilian casualties.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments