Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Secret talks on pay deal to break railway strike

Martin Whitfield
Tuesday 16 August 1994 23:02 BST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

SECRET discussions are taking place between Railtrack and the Department of Transport over a new pay deal to break the signal workers' strike.

Railtrack officials are seeking clarification of how much more they can pay signal staff to induce them to sign individual contracts without breaching the Government's strict public sector pay policy.

Informal soundings among the 4,700 strikers, who ended a 48-hour stoppage at midnight, have made it clear that Railtrack's existing offer would not be accepted by enough workers for an appeal over the head of the union to succeed.

A further 48-hour strike was called yesterday by leaders of the National Union of Rail, Maritime and Transport Workers to begin immediately after August Bank Holiday Monday, adding to the pressure on Railtrack to end the 10-week long dispute.

Issuing personal contracts is believed to be the only active option being considered by Railtrack if the rail union RMT does not agree to open negotiations on restructuring rather than insisting on an up-front payment for past productivity.

David Armstrong, head of human resources, said yesterday that any offer on personal contracts was a high risk tactic in a dispute where signal staff have a considerable degree of public support. 'Once you have gone down that road there is no turning back,' he said. 'The best way to achieve a settlement is by five days of serious negotiations.'

Railtrack yesterday claimed the first breakthough in its efforts to get signal workers to break the strike, with a quarter of staff in East Anglia reporting for duty. But fewer than 300 of the RMT's members are ignoring the strike call and BR was able to run only about a third of its 15,000 services yesterday, the same as in previous stoppages.

It is believed that Railtrack would have to make significant improvements in the pounds 4.3m it has set aside to finance its restructuring package, but a substantial increase is almost certain to bring the payments into conflict with public sector pay targets. Workers are being offered rises on basic rates of between 13 and 26 per cent but would lose overtime and other payments.

About 1,000 signal workers could be a pounds 100 a month worse off under Railtrack's current proposals. Extra payments to ensure staff do not lose out and accept Railtrack's demands for compulsory Sunday working and 12-hour shifts are believed to be at the centre of new proposals.

The Department of Transport said that Railtrack continually kept ministers and officials informed of the progress of the dispute and the company's attempts to resolve it. But the department would not confirm that discussions had taken place on the precise boundaries of the public sector pay policy which allows pay rises financed through productivity increases.

The strength of public support for the signal workers was underlined by unpublished poll evidence that people directly inconvenienced by the strikes support the action by a margin of nearly two to one, writes Michael McCarthy. A fifth of those polled, by Mori for the Mail on Sunday, described themselves as inconvenienced by the action. Of this group, 62 per cent thought the strike action was right, with 32 per cent disagreeing. When asked which side they back, 62 per cent of the same group said they backed the RMT, with only 17 per cent supporting Railtrack.

Leading article, page 13

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in