'Sea Empress' lies in Belfast dockyard
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.The Harland and Wolff shipyard in Belfast has beaten off stiff international competition to land the contract for a dry-dock damage assessment of the Sea Empress, which spilled around 70,000 tons of crude oil when it ran aground on Welsh beaches last February, writes Peter Victor.
A number of other yards are now tendering for the contract to repair the tanker.
Environmentalists are still counting the cost of the spillage, which damaged more protected wildlife sites than any other single pollution incident.
Twenty-six Government- designated sites of special scientific interest (SSSIs) on the coastline of west Wales were hit by slicks. The sites stretched from the beaches and dunes of Pendine and Laugharne Sands in the east to Wales's only undersea nature reserve, around the island of Skomer in the west.
At least 120 miles of beach was oiled, most of it within the Pembrokeshire Coastal National Park. Some 2,500 birds were killed by spilled oil. A further 3,000 oiled birds were rescued alive by the RSPCA.
An inquiry into the spillage found that the master of the ship and the pilot had not discussed a plan for the approach before the vessel entered the West Channel at the mouth of Milford Haven.
The interim report by accident investigators, published by the Government last March, indicated that errors were made by the Milford Haven pilot and not by the tanker's crew. The Department of Transport's Marine Accident Investigation Branch found that the ship had no known deficiencies.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments