Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Scientists want to 'nuke' their image

Steve Connor
Tuesday 08 December 1998 00:02 GMT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

FED UP with being associated with environmental catastrophe and atomic holocausts, nuclear physicists are considering dropping the dreaded N-word from their name.

A debate is raging within one of science's least understood backwaters on how to improve the image of a community that feels unfairly tarnished by the public's fear of anything nuclear. A group of European nuclear physicists will discuss how to repackage their image as part of a debate aimed at securing EU funding.

One of the most radical suggestions is to find a label which does not have the doom-laden connotations of the destruction of Hiroshima or of disasters such as Chernobyl.

"One of the image problems they identified was the word nuclear," said Peter Rogers, editor of the journal Physics World. "I asked ... what is the link between nuclear-physics research and nuclear power and nuclear weapons. If the link is weak or non-existent, one way to solve the problem would be to change the name."

Scientists studying atomic nuclei are helping to understand the forces of creation rather than using them for destruction, said Jim Al-Khalili, a nuclear physicist at Surrey University. He added that many physicists would oppose a name change, because it would look as if they have something to hide.

But precedents have been set: magnetic resonance imaging, which is used for scanning body organs, was changed from "nuclear magnetic resonance" as a way of reassuring patients, Dr Al-Khalili said.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in