Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Scientist blows the whistle on male chauvinist referees

Glenda Cooper Social Affairs Correspondent
Wednesday 23 September 1998 23:02 BST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

THE BEAUTIFUL game is still a man's game, according to male referees who cannot see women's football matches as the "real thing", new research reveals.

While football is Britain's fastest growing women's sport, the feeling among referees is still that "there's football and then there's women's football", the British Psychological Society's social psychology conference was told yesterday.

Dr Lindsey Patterson, senior lecturer at Manchester Metropolitan University, and a keen player, analysed the behaviour of referees in 28 five-a-side association football matches each lasting 40 minutes and involving men's and women's teams.

When supervising women's games, referees' attitudes ranged from "unprintable" comments to yawning and walking off to talk to spectators.

But when it came to men's games, Dr Patterson found that the referees interacted far more with the players, and expressed solidarity with them verbally. "They would call the players mate, fella, lad, encouraging them and talking to them. There is a difficulty as there are no equivalent terms for women but the referees did not even use a safe option such as calling them by their team colours - `Go on yellow' and so on," she said.

She added that referees were also more likely to explain their decisions to male players, whereas with women they would ignore them or patronisingly recount the rule to them.

They also saw women calling fouls as "overreacting" - either believing that women did not foul deliberately but were just being a "bit clumsy" or that they could not cope with the physical nature of football and reminded the players that it was "a contact sport".

"They also saw someone brought down by a tackle as lack of skill rather than a foul," Dr Patterson said.

Their interest in the game could also seem minimal. "Some of the referees almost ignored the football, yawning or appearing bored. They also seemed to do a lot more walking off the pitch to talk to people than they did in the men's games," Dr Patterson said. "They also sometimes made questionable comments, most of which are unprintable.

"The image was that men's football was the real thing and women's was not as good," she told the psychologists. "It is still a very male-dominated area and although it is gradually improving there is still a long way to go."

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in