Antiviral Covid drug linked to virus mutations, study suggests
Researchers say their findings are helpful in the ongoing assessment of the risks and benefits of molnupiravir treatment.
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.An antiviral drug used to treat Covid-19 patients could be linked to mutations in the virus, new research suggests.
The medication, molnupiravir, works by causing mutations in the virus’s genetic information, or genome, and many of these mutations will damage or kill the virus, reducing the amount of virus in the body.
However, the new study found that in some patients, the drug – which is supposed to weaken the virus – does not kill the virus, and instead these mutated viruses can spread.
Researchers say their findings are helpful in the ongoing assessment of the risks and benefits of molnupiravir treatment.
Our work is important because it demonstrates that molnupiravir treatment can give rise to significantly mutated viruses which remain viable, and in some cases transmissible
Although the drug is not immediately dangerous to people taking it, the study may have important implications for the future direction of the pandemic.
Molnupiravir was one of the first antivirals available during the Covid-19 pandemic and was widely adopted by many countries.
Using global databases to map the virus mutations, the researchers found changes in the virus which looked very different from typical patterns of Covid mutations.
According to the findings, published in Nature, the mutations were strongly associated with people who had taken molnupiravir.
Additionally, these mutations increased in 2022, coinciding with the introduction of molnupiravir.
Ryan Hisner, masters student in bioinformatics at the University of Cape Town, said: “Our findings show that molnupiravir creates genetically divergent viruses capable not only of replicating but transmitting, with unknown consequences for the global public.”
He added that this should have been of greater concern when the drug was tested in clinical trials, and regulators now need to be proactive in monitoring for the effects of drugs that work by causing mutations.
Since molnupiravir was proposed as a treatment some experts have raised concerns that it could accelerate the creation of new variants of concern, but there is no evidence it has led to this.
Theo Sanderson, lead author and postdoctoral researcher at the Francis Crick Institute, said: “Our work is important because it demonstrates that molnupiravir treatment can give rise to significantly mutated viruses which remain viable, and in some cases transmissible.
“We find that molnupiravir can result in the appearance of large numbers of mutations over a short period of time.
“It is important to note that mutations are not inherently bad, they can make the virus less effective at replicating (that is the intended action of molnupiravir) as well as more.”
Christopher Ruis, from the Department of Medicine at the University of Cambridge, said: “Molnupiravir is one of a number of drugs being used to fight Covid-19.
“It belongs to a class of drugs that can cause the virus to mutate so much that it is fatally weakened.
“But what we’ve found is that in some patients this process doesn’t kill all the viruses, and some mutated viruses can spread.
“This is important to take into account when assessing the overall benefits and risks of molnupiravir and similar drugs.”
The study, by researchers at the Francis Crick Institute, the University of Cambridge, Imperial College London, the University of Liverpool, the University of Cape Town and the UK Health Security Agency (UKHSA), also found the mutations were more likely in older age groups consistent with the use of the antivirals to treat people who are more at risk.
In England, the researchers analysed treatment data and found that at least 30% of the events involved the use of molnupiravir.
Dr Sanderson said: “Our findings are useful for ongoing assessment of the risks and benefits of molnupiravir treatment.
“The possibility of persistent antiviral-induced mutations needs to be taken into account for the development of new drugs which work in a similar way.”
The causes of mutational events can be traced by looking at their mutational signature – a preference for mutations to occur at particular points in the virus.
There was a close match between the signature seen in these mutational events and the signature in clinical trials of molnupiravir, researchers say.
The findings are of critical value to our understanding of how the use of this specific antiviral drug could have been better implemented
The researchers also saw signs of onward transmission from one person to another, although no established variants of concern are currently linked to this.
According to the experts, it is also important to consider that chronic Covid infections, which molnupiravir is used for, can themselves result in new mutations.
Stephen Griffin, professor of cancer virology, University of Leeds, said: “This paper is an incredibly important, well-conducted piece of research.
“The findings are of critical value to our understanding of how the use of this specific antiviral drug could have been better implemented, but also reminds us of more general aspects of good practice and antimicrobial stewardship.
“It is worth noting that the use of this drug is not immediately dangerous to individuals taking it, but these findings have important implications for the future direction of the pandemic.”