Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

'Toumai man' is really a female ape, say anthropologists

Steve Connor
Thursday 10 October 2002 00:00 BST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

As your White House correspondent, I ask the tough questions and seek the answers that matter.

Your support enables me to be in the room, pressing for transparency and accountability. Without your contributions, we wouldn't have the resources to challenge those in power.

Your donation makes it possible for us to keep doing this important work, keeping you informed every step of the way to the November election

Head shot of Andrew Feinberg

Andrew Feinberg

White House Correspondent

A skull described as the oldest human fossil is more likely the head of a female ape, say leading anthropologists.

Milford Wolpoff and colleagues from the University of Michigan in Ann Arbor believe the skull of "Toumai man" which was unearthed in the Djurab desert of northern Chad is not actually human.

Earlier this year a team of French anthropologists said that Toumai man – which means "hope for life" in the local Goran language – was a hominid fossil between six and seven million years old, making it man's oldest ancestor. But Professor Wolpoff disputes this claim in a letter published today in the journal Nature. He says the Toumai fossil fails to show the critical signs that it belonged to an ape-like animal that walked on two legs.

"Toumai may be a common ancestor of apes and humans but it is not on the line directly leading to humans," Professor Wolpoff said yesterday. "We think Toumai is an ape and we think it's probably a female because of its canine teeth." Although the canine teeth were relatively small, like those of humans, their size was still within the range of chimpanzees and female gorillas, Professor Wolpoff said.

Scars on the skull left by neck muscles suggest that Toumai man walked on four legs with the head held in a horizontal position on the spine.

Professor Michel Brunet from the University of Poitiers in France, who led the team that described the discovery of Toumai man, replied in a letter to Naturethat Professor Wolpoff and colleagues misrepresented the specimen's shapeand failed to "identify a single character to support their suggestion".

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in