Scientists raise doubts over whether sunspot activity has increased in recent decades
The so-called 'grand maximum' of sunspots in the latter half of the 20th Century has been touted as a possible cause of increased temperatures on Earth
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Scientists have raised doubts over whether sunspot activity has increased in recent decades – which some researchers have argued as a cause of global warming – following a re-analysis of a historical records that goes back as far as Galileo at the start of the 17th Century.
The so-called “grand maximum” of sunspots in the latter half of the 20th Century has been controversially touted as a possible cause of increased temperatures on Earth, but Frederic Clette of the Royal Observatory in Brussels said that there is little evidence for an increase in sunspot activity.
“We find no such grand maximum. There has been nothing exceptional about the level of solar activity,” Dr Clette told a meeting of the International Astronomical Union in Honolulu, Hawaii.
He and has team identified several sources of systematic bias in the two lists of sunspots that have been recorded over many years. One of the errors in recording could be attributed to the failing eyesight of an ageing observer in Switzerland who was seeing fewer sunspots over time, Dr Clette told the meeting.
“In other cases, skywatchers were focused on making other solar observations, so if their notes do not mention sunspots this does not necessarily mean that none were present,” said a report in the journal Nature.
When Dr Clette and his colleague recalibrated the two lists after developing a method of choosing a main sunspot observer for a given interval of time while ensuring that observers from adjacent periods overlapped to give smooth transitions, the grand maximum of the latter half of the 20th Century disappeared, the journal says.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments