Royal Institution board survives vote
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Rebel members at the Royal Institution (RI), the 211-year-old scientific research centre, last night failed in their bid to oust its ruling body and reinstate Baroness Susan Greenfield as the head of the organisation.
The 512-to-121 vote in favour of the board followed came after a two-hour debate attended by 650 members. Supporters of the former director, who was made redundant in January, had called a special general meeting to replace the ruling council with a new transitional team. But last night's vote saw 81 per cent of members go against a resolution calling for the leadership to be ousted. It means that the new team led by Adrian de Ferranti, the chairman, can continue financial restructuring of the organisation which is thought to be losing £100,000 a month.
Supporters say that Lady Greenfield, one of the country's leading neuroscientists, had been unfairly blamed for the institution's funding position. Lady Greenfield has since launched legal proceedings against her former employer, claiming she was the victim of sexual discrimination and unfairly dismissed.
In a statement before the vote, those backing the move to oust the current leadership said the redundancy of the directorship was "but one example of detrimental governance and disregard for the members".
A statement from the RI said: "We are delighted with the result and extremely pleased the members have given their support to the Council and staff."
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments