Risks from epidurals were 'exaggerated'
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Epidurals and spinal anaesthetics are safer than previously thought, according to a study published today.
Previous analyses have overestimated the risks of severe complications of the procedures, according to the study, which found the risk of permanent harm following a spinal anaesthetic or epidural was lower than one in 20,000 and often much lower. The research, published in the British Journal of Anaesthesia, found the risk of permanent injury – defined as symptoms lasting more than six months –was about one in 23,000 to one in 50,000.
The risk of being paralysed was two to three times rarer than of suffering any permanent harm, and the risk for women requiring pain relief for labour or Caesarean section was lower still, with the most pessimistic estimate of permanent harm being one in 80,000.
The study found that the risk of harm when an epidural was used for surgery was considerably higher than during childbirth – between one in 6,000 and one in 12,000. But this was also lower than previous estimates.
Dr Tim Cook of the Royal United Hospital, Bath, who led the project, said the higher risk was probably because many patients were elderly with medical problems "and that the surgery itself increases risks".
Subscribe to Independent Premium to bookmark this article
Want to bookmark your favourite articles and stories to read or reference later? Start your Independent Premium subscription today.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments