Nasa plans to scale back missions to Mars to save money, claim scientists
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Nasa is about to propose "irrational" major cuts to its exploration of other planets, especially Mars, scientists claim.
Budget constraints mean Nasa executives have had to decide whether to invest in space exploration in the neighbouring planet or the far-off cosmos.
Scientists who have been briefed on the 2013 budget, which will be published next week, fear the US space agency will cancel two planned joint missions with Europe to explore Mars in 2016 and 2018. Nasa had agreed to pay $1.4bn for the project. Some Mars missions will continue, but the fate of future flights is unclear.
Two scientists, who asked not to be named, said the cuts to the Mars missions were part of a proposed reduction of about $300m in Nasa's $1.5bn planetary science budget. More than $200m of those cuts are in the Mars programme, they said. The current Mars budget is $581.7m.
"It is totally irrational and unjustified," said Edward Weiler, who until September was Nasa's associate administrator for science. "[The US is] the only country on this planet that has the demonstrated ability to land on another planet, namely Mars. It is a national prestige issue."
AP
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments