Giraffes considered for ‘endangered’ status after steady population decline
‘We love these animals, and they’ve been undergoing a silent extinction without the public being aware of it’
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.The US Fish and Wildlife Service took a major step towards protecting giraffes under the Endangered Species Act on Thursday, saying their protection by the law may be warranted after conservation groups petitioned for their inclusion.
Giraffes, which inhabit numerous countries across Africa, have seen their population steadily decrease and are considered “vulnerable” by the International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN). Just over 97,000 giraffes remained in the wild in 2016, and their population has suffered a decline of 36 to 40 per cent from 1985, the IUCN estimates.
“The service finds that the petition to list the giraffe presented substantial information on potential threats associated with development, agriculture and mining,” the US Fish and Wildlife Service said.
The Centre for Biological Diversity, Natural Resources Defence Council, Humane Society of the United States/Humane Society International and International Fund for Animal Welfare have fought for the giraffe’s protection for two years, beginning with a petition to the agency in April 2017.
When the US Fish and Wildlife Service passed its stated 90-day review period to consider the petition, three of the organisations filed a lawsuit in December to prod the agency to make a decision.
Thursday’s decision means that the US Fish and Wildlife Service will conduct its own review, which can take up to 12 months, to assess whether giraffes merit inclusion on the list.
That review is followed by a public comment period, after which the agency announces whether the species will be covered under the Endangered Species Act.
The conservation groups’ 2017 petition said that giraffes were under threat from legal and illegal hunting, as well as loss of habitat because of human encroachment.
“We love these animals, and they’ve been undergoing a silent extinction without the public being aware of it,” said Tanya Sanerib, international legal director at the Centre for Biological Diversity.
US trade plays a significant threat to the species.
Between 2006 and 2015, 39,516 giraffe specimens, including dead and live animals, as well as their parts or derivatives, were imported into the United States, according to the 2017 petition.
That includes 21,402 bone carvings, 3,008 skin pieces and 3,744 hunting trophies. The conservation groups arrived at that number using the US Fish and Wildlife Service’s data on wildlife products and a review of online sales of giraffe products.
As it stands, giraffe parts are subject to virtually no restrictions by the United States, said Adam Peyman, programmes and operations manager at Humane Society International.
“The bar is at the ground. You can import whatever products you want,” he said.
If giraffes are ultimately protected by the Endangered Species Act, Mr Peyman explained, anyone who wishes to import giraffes or their parts, “would need to meet a much higher bar, which is that this product would somehow be contributing to the conservation of the species”.
The Washington Post
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments