Major plan to deal with climate change by geoengineering the Earth would not work, scientists reveal
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.The Earth could not be changed to save the environment, according to a new paper exploring the possibilities of "geoengineering" the planet to protect us from the worst effects of climate change.
Injecting aerosols into the atmosphere is one of the great hopes for mitigating the effects of climate change. Proponents argue that it would help counter most of the changes to the climate, as well as being cheap and quick to implement.
It would work by limiting the amount of sunlight that could get through the environment. In essence, the aerosols injected into the atmosphere would work something like a shade, reducing the amount of light and keeping the worst effects of climate change at bay.
But the new research suggests that the plan would wipe out crop yields to such a degree that it would undo any of the positive benefits gained by limiting the effects of climate change. While it might provide some protection it would also damage agriculture deeply, they write in the new paper published in Nature.
Scientists looked at the aftermath of two volcanic events to understand how the geoengineering might change the Earth. Both events had a similar effect to the "veil" concept and helped it inspire it – the volcanic eruptions threw similar chemicals up into the stratosphere.
Researchers looked at what happened to aerosol levels, solar irradiation data and recorded crop yields in the aftermath of the eruption of El Chichón in Mexico and the explosion of Mount Pinatubo in the Philippines. They studied different kinds of crops and looked at how they coped with those natural disasters.
They found that what benefit the veil would offer to crops by blocking out heat would be offset by the damage done by not getting enough sunlight. As such, the plan would not mitigate the effects of climate change on global agriculture and food security, they conclude.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments