Archaeologists discover how 6,000-year-old Spanish structure was built with stones heavier than at Stonehenge

Structure was built using ‘advanced knowledge’ in fields of geology, physics, geometry, and astronomy

Vishwam Sankaran
Wednesday 28 August 2024 07:19 BST
Comments
Related video: Stonehenge’s Altar Stone Likely Came from Scotland, Study Reveals

Your support helps us to tell the story

As your White House correspondent, I ask the tough questions and seek the answers that matter.

Your support enables me to be in the room, pressing for transparency and accountability. Without your contributions, we wouldn't have the resources to challenge those in power.

Your donation makes it possible for us to keep doing this important work, keeping you informed every step of the way to the November election

Head shot of Andrew Feinberg

Andrew Feinberg

White House Correspondent

A megalithic burial mound in Spain was built using “advanced engineering” 6,000 years ago, with stones weighing several times more than any used to make the UK’s iconic Stonehenge, archaeologists revealed in a new study.

Megalithic monuments began appearing in Europe around the fifth millennium BC with the earliest ones built in modern-day France and Spain.

The Dolmen de Menga burial mound is the oldest of its kind, built around 3800 to 3600 BC with all of its stones weighing several times more than any used to make the Stonehenge – making it one of the largest megaliths in Europe.

The stones used in the Menga mound – some weighing as much as 150 tonnes – were carved from a site about a kilometre from the Stone Age monument.

Researchers have proposed many theories over the years attempting to explain how a primitive Stone Age culture could have built such a massive monument.

Entrance to Menga
Entrance to Menga (José Antonio Lozano Rodríguez/Science Advances (2024))

However, they say comprehensive efforts to understand the engineering and labour that went behind constructing the massive structure “have been quite rare”.

“Menga has never been analysed from an interdisciplinary perspective combining archaeological, sedimentological and paleontological evidence,” scientists wrote.

The new study, published in the journal Science Advances, suggests the Menga was built using advanced knowledge in the fields of geology, physics, geometry, and astronomy, enabling it to stand on its feet for almost 6000 years.

Archaeologists uncover 5,000-year-old storage in western Türkiye

The megalithic structure consists of stone walls and a stone ceiling supported by stone pillars.

Researchers say stones used to build the monument, weighing over 100 tonnes each, were carved from a hill site about 850m away and then dragged on sledges over a wooden trackway.

They theorise that workers dragged the rocks to the site by wedging each tightly using counterweights and ramps.

New analysis suggests the stones were placed at a slight inward angle using levers, indicating that the Stone Age people had early knowledge of geometry.

Placing the stones in such an angle reduced the size of the roof needed, and made the monument look more trapezoidal, archaeologists say.

The Stone Age neolithic people then placed the pillar stones in a similar angled manner and finished the structure by placing massive capstones on top to serve as the roof.

Dolmen chamber
Dolmen chamber (Antequera Dolmens Archaeological Site/Science Advances (2024))

The use of pillars to support the gigantic capstones and the precise interlocking of the upright stones are features requiring a high degree of precision that is not seen in any other megalithic construction of the time.

“An in-depth knowledge of the properties and location of the rocks available in the region, notions of elementary physics was necessary to move and place the gigantic stones,” scientists wrote.

“Our results show that Menga is a unique example of creative genius and early science among Neolithic societies. It was designed as a completely original engineering project,” they added.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in