Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Royal palaces cost taxpayer pounds 6.7m

Tuesday 05 August 1997 23:02 BST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Upkeep of the historic Royal palaces, including the Tower of London (below) and Hampton Court, cost the taxpayer pounds 6.7m last year. The bill for new facilities - which will mean tourists can get a cup of tea at the Tower for the first time - helped to send the Government body running the palaces further into the red.

The annual report and accounts of the Historic Royal Palaces agency, presented to Parliament yesterday, shows a net operating deficit of pounds 7.5m in 1997, compared with pounds 4.5m in 1996.

However, the agency has raised the amount of income generated from pounds 12m to pounds 29m in the seven years it has been responsible for the palaces. It has also halved the proportion of its expenditure borne by the taxpayer from 35 per cent to 17 per cent.

Chief executive David Beeton said: "The palaces have always required subsidy from the taxpayer and [the] subsidy for last year is significantly lower than the subsidy that we inherited."

He added that there was "a possibility" the agency might not have to draw upon the taxpayer by the turn of the century, providing the tourist industry remains buoyant and fears of a recession prove unfounded.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in