Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Row over fees set to silence TV's golden-voiced stars

Clare Garner
Sunday 20 April 1997 23:02 BST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

A number of Britain's leading actors may become embroiled in a dispute between Equity, their union, and the advertising industry over rates of pay for voice-overs.

Equity has instructed its 40,000 members to refuse to do any new British television advertisements after 1 May, when the present agreement expires, unless the previous terms apply.

Among the household names who do voice-overs are union members such as Angus Deayton and Harry Enfield, as well as Richard Wilson, Michael Gambon and Zoe Wanamaker, all three of whom have taken active roles in union protests in the past. The Institute of Practitioners in Advertising (IPA), which represents agencies, is keen to cut fees on the grounds that they are out of kilter with payments for on-screen appearances and with payments for voice-overs in other European countries.

Graham Hinton, president of IPA, said: "UK voice-over fees are nine times the level of Germany and eight times the level of France. And they are way ahead of those for visual artists - with none of the restrictions."

Voice-over work is lucrative. The average job takes little more than an hour, for which the studio fee is between pounds 80 and pounds 300, and the actor will net a further pounds 2,000 in repeat fees. One advertising insider described the work as "money for old rope".

Equity defends the levels of payments, arguing that doing voice-overs is a highly skilled job. "Everyone thinks they could do a voice-over, but they cannot," said Christine Payne, head of Equity's television department. "Acting is a skill, actors are highly trained and the right performance can make a lot of money for the advertiser."

Nick Phillips, director general of IPA, said last night: "The agreement lasted for five years, from autumn 1991 to autumn 1996. It has already been extended for a period with a view to continuing discussions. Now agencies will be operating without a formal agreement. What will happen is really uncharted territory."

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in