Row builds up over the latest privatisation
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Christian Wolmar
Ministers have been accused of rushing through the privatisation of the Building Research Establishment without creating a "level playing field for all bidders".
Nick Raynsford, the shadow construction minister, has accused his counterpart, Robert Jones, the minister for construction, of being "economical with the truth" over the privatisation of the BRE, which carries out research on building materials for the Government and the industry. The BRE is being sold to an in-house management team which beat off competition from University College London and the deal is supposed to be completed within the next few days at a price that has yet to be announced.
Earlier this week Mr Raynsford failed in a call for an emergency debate on the issue in Parliament. He said an internal study group into the future of the BRE had been set up to examine a range of issues relating to the organisation's income, efficiency and expenditure. Five members of the in-house management bid team were on that group and Mr Raynsford claimed that this gave them an unfair advantage over outside bidders.
He said that in parliamentary answers Mr Jones had claimed that no documentation relating to that group had been disclosed to either bidder. However, in a subsequent answer, Mr Jones confirmed that five members of the in-house team had been on the study group.
Mr Raynsford told the Commons: "I believe that this involves a serious failure to give full and straightforward answers to parliamentary questions."
Mr Raynsford is demanding an inquiry into the sale by the Commons Environment Committee and said yesterday: "The way in which this privatisation has been conducted raises serious grounds for concern. The Goverment is desperate to rush this privatisation through for ideological reasons with scant regard to the public interest."
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments