Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Since the inception of the NHS in 1948, new treatments and procedures have been introduced in a piecemeal and haphazard fashion. The rationale for implementation appeared to be "if it is new, it must be better and we must have it".
In fact, it is estimated that less than 15 per cent of health service "interventions" have been proved to be beneficial to patients. It comes as no surprise to learn that in the new cost-conscious, market-style NHS, some of these interventions are to be phased out.
Stephen Dorrell, Secretary of State for Health, declined yesterday to spell out which treatments would be phased out of routine use in NHS hospitals and clinics but it is not difficult to guess what they might be.
John Yates, a former government adviser, has said that of the top 10 operations performed in NHS hospitals, only hernia repair and cataract surgery are widely regarded as sound procedures with a high degree of clinical agreement about who will benefit and when the operations should be done.
The more questionable operations include hysterectomy, tonsillectomy, D&C or womb scrape before the age of 40, and the insertion of grommets to treat glue ear. In the latter case, 80 per cent or more clear up without treatment.
There are some "innovations" that have assumed popularity without adequate investigation of their use or proper training of the people who use them: keyhole surgery is one example. Several patients have suffered long-term internal damage after inappropriate use of keyhole surgery or less than optimum handling of the equipment.
Chorionic villus sampling (CVS) was hailed as a major advance in pre- natal diagnostic testing as doctors were able to perform it weeks earlier than existing tests such amniocentesis. It was widely reported in newspapers and was adopted for routine use prematurely, according to some doctors, as women demanded the test from their obstetricians. Subsequently, a link was established between CVS before 10 weeks and limb defects in babies. Now CVS is performed after 10 weeks.
Obstetrics in general has a reputation for adopting, wholesale, new techniques without good evidence for their benefits. Mass foetal screening - the use of probes attached to the foetal scalp during labour to monitor its status regardless of a problematic delivery or not - is widely believed to have caused more difficulties than it solved. Meanwhile, cheap and proven treatments, such as steroidal drugs to help mature the lungs of babies likely to be born early, went unheeded.
Stephen Dorrell yesterday called time on inefficient, obsolete treatments and those that are expensive and have limited application. They are likely to be replaced with innovations such as gene therapy, designer drugs, robotics in surgery, and more accurate diagnostic tests.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments