Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Right to private calls `not enough'

Jo Butler
Friday 20 August 1999 23:02 BST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

CIVIL RIGHTS campaigners warned yesterday that moves to give people the right to make private telephone calls at work did not go far enough in protecting workers from increasing workplace surveillance.

The campaign group Liberty called for statutory regulation of all forms of surveillance, including call monitoring. The appeal follows new guidelines issued by Oftel, the telephone industry regulator, which say that companies that routinely record phone conversations between staff and customers must provide unmonitored lines for staff to make and receive personal calls.

Liberty's director, John Wadham, said: "Oftel's guidelines are to be welcomed. However, we also need proper statutory regulation - and not only for call monitoring. Surveillance at work has increased drastically in recent years, with employees subjected to a range of invasive practices, including keystroke monitoring, video surveillance, interception of e- mails, and random drug testing. Clear and strict limits should be placed on what employers are legally entitled to do."

The Oftel guidelines have been issued to ensure that companies comply with the European Convention on Human Rights, which gives employees the right to privacy.

The Home Office said it was already consulting on the need to tighten the regulations over the interception of communications. A recent consultation paper said: "The law needs to recognise that there are perfectly respectable reasons for allowing employers to record telephone conversations in the workplace. But the practice needs to be regulated by law in a way which ensures that the rights of employees are respected in circumstances where they have a reasonable expectation of privacy."

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in