Retreat on changes to legal aid scheme
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.THE beleaguered Lord Chancellor is expected to signal a significant retreat on changes to legal aid when he publishes a consultative paper next week, writes Anthony Bevins.
Lord Irvine of Lairg was due to have published his proposals yesterday, but they were held back because they would have clashed with announcements on access to the countryside and lifelong learning.
It had been expected that Lord Irvine would propose the abolition of legal aid for all civil damage claims, effectively abolishing legal aid and replacing it with a "no-win, no-fee" system.
But Labour sources believe that controversial plan has been watered down, with no-win, no-fee restricted initially to personal injury claims - with a view to seeing how that worked.
That was being seen at Westminster as a device to shelve and quietly bury the more radical proposals initially favoured by the Lord Chancellor. "It means goodbye to all that," said one Labour source.
There will be no doubt in the mind of Lord Irvine's critics that his recent problems over his Whitehall "empire building"; his clashes with other departmental ministers, like Jack Straw, the Home Secretary; and the adverse publicity he has been getting over the redecoration of his official residence, have all weakened his bargaining hand over legal aid reform.
"Derry does not want a great fight on his hands at this time," said one friend last night.
"He does not want to be portrayed as the man who took legal aid away from poor people, spending it all on his wallpaper instead."
Lord Irvine's consultation paper will also include proposals to accelerate civil actions.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments