Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Red Cross to review shares in arms firm

Matthew Brace
Thursday 27 February 1997 00:02 GMT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

The British Red Cross owns shares in an arms manufacturer, in direct contravention of its ethical investment policy, it was revealed last night.

The 320 shares in Vickers, worth a total of pounds 867, owned by a regional branch of the British Red Cross has come as an embarrassment to the charity whose employees are famed for their heroism in war zones around the world.

Last night the charity announced that it was launching an investigation into the affair.

A spokeswoman said it was sifting through its various branches around the country to find out which one owned the shares. She said when the branch is identified, the charity will recommend it sells the shares immediately "because this does not fit in with our ethical policy of investment".

However, as the regional branches of the British Red Cross are autonomous, they do not have to obey the council's recommendation.

"We were told about this by the Campaign Against the Arms Trade and when we looked into this we found that the shares are not held in our Common Investment Fund," the spokeswoman added.

The Common Investment Fund is overseen by the charity's governing council and makes a special effort to avoid unethical companies. The fund at present consists of holdings in 91 companies - a portfolio worth an estimated pounds 10m.

The shares were unearthed in an investigation by the pressure group, Campaign Against the Arms Trade. Its findings, published in today's Daily Mirror, claim several charities, including the Girl Guides Association, Great Ormond Street Leukaemia Fund, the St Bart's Hospital in London, and Battersea Dogs Home, invest in companies in the arms business.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in