Rebuke for Cook over Sierra Leone
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.ROBIN COOK'S most senior official will face severe criticism next week from an official inquiry into the arms-to-Sierra Leone affair, The Independent has learnt.
The Foreign Secretary will be rebuked for failings in his department, but will be cleared of knowing a British firm was shipping arms in breach of a UN embargo.
A report from the Commons Select Committee on Foreign Affairs, to be published next Tuesday, will be more hard-hitting than Sir Thomas Legg's investigation, ordered by Mr Cook, which reported last July.
Sir John Kerr, Permanent Secretary at the Foreign Office and Head of the Diplomatic Service, will take the brunt of the report's most damaging findings. His officials held meetings with representatives from Sandline, the British firm of mercenaries that shipped arms to Sierra Leone.
The company, Sir John and Mr Cook will all be criticised for withholding information and witnesses from the select committee. Its inquiry was refused permission to interview Sir David Spedding, the head of MI6, and met fierce resistance from the Foreign Office over access to official dispatches. Sir David gave evidence instead to the Commons Intelligence and Security Committee in private.
However, one committee source said Sir John was unlikely to face dismissal as a result of the report. "There are criticisms all the way along the line. That's the difference between our report and the Legg report. We saw faults at almost every level. I doubt if Robin Cook will exactly enjoy the report," the source said.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments