Railtrack is 'worse than British Rail'
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.THE NATIONAL rail network is in a worse condition than at privatisation, according to a report yesterday that criticised Railtrack's investment record.
The report, commissioned by the rail regulator, said Railtrack had failed to tackle train delays, shabby stations and ageing signalling. It also found Railtrack's maintenance spending was "below expectations" and warned that a backlog of work was emerging.
John Prescott, the Deputy Prime Minister, said: "The report paints a sorry picture of its performance as stewards of the country's railway network."
He said he was considering paying the pounds 1.5bn annual subsidy direct to Railtrack, giving the Government a big voice in the company's strategy, as The Independent reported on Monday.
Shares in Railtrack fell yesterday with the publication of the report by consultants Booz Allen, who were commissioned last year by the outgoing rail regulator to measure Railtrack's performance since 1995. The new rail regulator, Tom Winsor, will use their findings to set the charges that train operators must pay to use Railtrack's network after 2001. Railtrack has already been told to deliver greater improvements or face a cap on its profits.
Booz Allen said: "It is likely that there has been a decline in the underlying quality of the network assets as a whole. Generally, Railtrack's physical activity in renewing assets has been below expectations."
The report said Railtrack had funnelled money to areas where it gained the most financial benefit at the expense of long-term projects to improve journeys for passengers.
Railtrack said the report had been written "with the benefit of hindsight" and before its pounds 27bn, 10-year investment plan was unveiled last month. It said it should be put in the context of a 25 per cent growth in passenger demand and a planned tripling of rail investment. Gerald Corbett, the chief executive of Railtrack, said: "The report highlights there is still much to do. We face huge challenges and Railtrack is dedicated to getting it right and doing better."
Save Our Railways, the pressure group, said the report left Railtrack's reputation "in tatters" and highlighted the need for tougher regulation.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments