Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Railtrack charged after man died reporting fault

Barrie Clement Transport Editor
Wednesday 28 July 1999 23:02 BST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

RAILTRACK AND two of its senior employees have been charged with manslaughter after a train driver was killed while using a telephone at the track side.

The company was allegedly told the telephone was too near the track on the line between Stockport and Manchester in 1993. But 19 months later the driver, Alan Griffiths, was killed after being knocked down by an express train while using it.

It is understood he had been ringing to report a difficulty with the line as instructed under health and safety regulations.

The case emerges at a time when there is great public disquiet over the failure of courts to find companies and senior employees guilty of manslaughter in such cases. There is also concern over safety standards in the privatised industry.

The Appeal Court has been asked to examine the law which allowed a judge to throw out charges of manslaughter against Great Western Trains after it was held responsible earlier this week for the Southall rail disaster. Although the Appeal Court is not being urged to reopen the case against GWT, the Attorney General, at the behest of the prosecution, is to ask the court to investigate the operation of the law on corporate manslaughter.

Relatives of the seven people killed in the Southall crash have denounced the pounds 1.5m fine levied by the Old Bailey judge as "derisory". While the fine was a record for a charge under the Health and Safety Act, lawyers acting for the families contended that it was insufficient to act as a deterrent.

It is only possible to bring a charge of manslaughter against a company if it is proved that one senior executive in an organisation was the "controlling mind" and therefore responsible for any "act or omission" which lead to fatalities.

In the Southall case, Richard George, the chief executive, was held to be ultimately responsible for safety, but not the "controlling mind".

Mr Justice Scott Baker, the presiding judge, acknowledged that the law was seen by some to be unsatisfactory because an individual had to be held culpable before an organisation could face a criminal charge. "However if the law is to be changed, it is up to Parliament to do so," he said. He pointed out that three years ago, the government-appointed Law Commission had argued for an offence of "corporate killing" to clear up the anomaly, but no action had been taken.

Louise Christian, head of a group of solicitors acting for relatives killed in the Southall crash, argued that the Government should immediately introduce legislation to make it easier to bring manslaughter charges against individual directors. She said there was considerable resistance at the Crown Prosecution Service and on the part of judges to put senior managers in the dock.

It has been notoriously difficult to hold any individual responsible in such cases. Individual directors were not held to be culpable when 187 lives were lost in the Herald of Free Enterprise tragedy; or in the 1987 King's Cross Tube fire.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in