Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Mysterious radioactive leak that swept Europe came from Russia, study confirms despite Kremlin denial

Moscow denies the Mayak facility was the source and has not released an official statement

Phoebe Weston
Science Correspondent
Tuesday 30 July 2019 07:30 BST
Comments
Mysterious radioactive leak that swept Europe came from Russia, study confirms despite Kremlin denial

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

The source of a mysterious radioactive leak that swept Europe in 2017 has been traced to a nuclear processing plant in the southern Ural mountains in Russia, a new study confirms.

Scientists analysed more than 1,300 data points all over the world to find the source of the enormous leak, which released 100 times more radiation in Europe than 2011’s Fukushima disaster.

The source – which is believed to be the Russian Mayak facility – was not a reactor accident but an incident in a nuclear reprocessing plant, researchers found.

Russia has always denied the facility was the source and no official statement has been released in response to this latest research.

The alarm bell was raised in October 2017 by Italian scientists who noticed a spike of the radioactive ruthenium-106. It was then detected in many European countries as well as in Asia, the Arabian Peninsula and even in the Caribbean.

The fact that ruthenium was the only radioactive material detected strongly suggested the source was a nuclear reprocessing plant, as reactor accidents typically release a number of different elements.

Scientists could pinpoint the release to between 6pm on 25 September 2017 to noon the following day.

“We measured radioactive ruthenium-106. The measurements indicate the largest singular release of radioactivity from a civilian reprocessing plant,” said Georg Steinhauser, one of the lead researchers from the University of Hannover.

The data was taken from 176 measuring stations in 29 countries. Despite the high concentration of radioactive material it was not harmful to human health anywhere in Europe, according to the paper published in scientific journal PNAS.

It is not the first time the Mayak plant has made headlines.

Almost exactly 60 years earlier, in 1957, the site suffered the world’s second most serious nuclear incident after Chernobyl when a tank containing liquid waste from plutonium production exploded and contaminated the area.

It led to the release of radiation over an area of over 20,000 square miles. The accident remained secret until 1976.

Professor Steinhauser said; “This time, however, it was a pulsed release that was over very quickly.

Secret locations of US nuclear weapons in Europe accidentally leaked

“We were able to show that the accident occurred in the reprocessing of spent fuel elements, at a very advanced stage, shortly before the end of the process chain,” he said.

The present-day Mayak plant has been a target for activists, who say managers have not learned the lessons of the 1957 disaster. They claim the increased production targets have come at the cost of safety.

“Even though there is currently no official statement, we have a very good idea of what might have happened,” Professor Steinhauser said.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in