Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Racehorse sales scam exposed

Kathy Moran
Sunday 14 November 1999 00:02 GMT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

RACEHORSE dealers routinely defraud unwary buyers by colluding to drive up the price of thoroughbreds, the former champion jockey and trainer John Francome said yesterday.

Commenting on the first successful prosecution of a bloodstock agency in the High Court, he said sales fixing was widespread in the racing industry.

Racehorse owner Gary Heywood sued Newmarket-based Curragh Bloodstock Agency after he was prompted into buying a horse for twice its real value by collusive bidding between Paul Webber, then employed by the agency, and his friend Oliver Sherwood.

"I think it will certainly make a lot of people think," Mr Francome said. "I know that Paul Webber and Oliver Sherwood have been done for this, but they are far from being the only people guilty of this."

His comments were echoed by senior Racing Post columnist Alistair Down who said: "There are lots of alleged malpractices in the sales world. Perhaps this is a warning shot across the bows to clean up their act a bit."

Mr Heywood brought the case after learning that Webber, the bloodstock agent he had employed to advise him, was also an adviser to the seller. He had been unaware that Webber had bought the horse in Ireland a year earlier for 8,000 guineas on behalf of Jan Steinman, who was the seller in his case.

Judge William Crawford found that Sherwood agreed to bid against Webber and Mr Heywood paid 28,000 guineas for a four-year-old gelding worth no more than 14,000 guineas.

The judge ruled that no competent agent would have advised Mr Heywood to pay more than 14,000 guineas and that there was a conflict between Webber's duty to Mr Heywood and his interest in Mr Steinman's profit.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in