Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Quarter of men are out of work after 55

Nicholas Timmins Public Policy Editor
Thursday 22 February 1996 00:02 GMT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

One in four men aged over 55 - and virtually half of men aged over 60 - is no longer in work, the Joseph Rowntree Foundation warned yesterday as it launched a wide-ranging research project on the future of employment.

Redundancy and forced early retirement - as well as people wishing to retire earlier - are cutting men off early from the world of work at considerable cost, said Pam Meadows, director of the Policy Studies Institute, who is acting as adviser to the project.

Companies and the public were losing expertise; those affected received heavily reduced pensions; and individuals were facing 20 years and more of healthy life with nothing to do, she said.

Yet 30 years ago, more than 95 per cent of those aged between 55 and 59 and more than 90 per cent of those aged between 60 and 64 were still economically active, while one-quarter worked on past 65. Now, fewer than one in ten does.

Available figures make it hard to distinguish between those who have voluntarily retired early and those forced out of work, she said. "For many people, it can be a face-saving formula to say they have retired early," she said. But in the late 1980s boom, when unemployment fell, more over-55s returned to the workforce, showing that many wished to continue working "maybe not full-time or in such heavy work as before, but it was clear a lot of them wanted jobs".

Employers and the labour market, she said, were in fact increasingly discriminating against men, with work shifting from the old and the young to those aged 25 to 50, and from men to women. Part- time women workers were being preferred to full-time men.

Older workers had been targeted for redundancy, partly because early retirement packages were easier to arrange, but also in the mistaken belief that older workers were hard to retrain and less flexible.

But Ms Meadows said that the greater experience and commitment they often brought to organisations and the "collective memory" which was shed as older workers departed were overlooked. This experience could often prevent employers in both the public and private sectors repeating their past mistakes.

"Older workers are unnecessarily being put on the scrap heap," she said. "If you were in an aeroplane when something went wrong, would you rather have a 50-year-old pilot or a 25-year-old who had never been in this position before?"

The plight of the older worker will form one part of a research programme on work, which was launched with a warning that mass unemployment would continue into the next century unless those who had jobs were prepared to pay for its reduction.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in