Q: Why are all the men in this picture black?; A: Because they make better runners than whites, says Roger Bannister
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Sir Roger Bannister, the first man to run the four-minute mile, yesterday walked into controversial territory by suggesting that black athletes have innate advantages in sport. Sir Roger, a neurologist and chairman of the Government Committee on Sport in Universities, said attributes of black athletes, such as more efficient muscles, may be partly responsible for them achieving their success.
"As a scientist rather than a sociologist I am prepared to risk political incorrectness by drawing attention to the seemingly obvious but under- stressed fact that black sprinters, and black athletes in general, all seem to have certain natural anatomical advantages," he told the British Association for the Advancement of Science in Newcastle.
Black athletes probably have inborn advantages in their anatomy and physiology. "Physiology becomes far more important than anatomy as running events get longer. It may be adaptation of muscles to life in hot climates," making their muscles for efficient.
"It may be that their power-to-weight ratio is better because of the relative lack of subcutaneous fatty insulating tissue in the skin; perhaps there are anatomical advantages in the length of the Achilles tendon - the longest in the body," he told the meeting. More controversially, Sir Roger suggested that innate differences may extend to mental attributes.
"The difference between great runners lies less in their anatomy and physiology than in their capacity for mental excitement - which is probably inborn - but which brings with it an ability to overcome or ignore discomfort, even pain, of extreme effort."
Sir Roger later said he realised that some people found the issue of racial differences in sport to be sensitive. "I don't think it is sensitive and that's why I made the point,'' he said.
"It seems to me perfectly obvious if you observe a phenomenon and you are a scientist you seek to explain the causes of it."
Frank Dick, Great Britain's chief athletics coach until last year, agreed. "There appears to be a racial advantage for sprinters, but it would be unfortunate if people concluded that because you're not black you're not going to win anything. It's more complex than that. It's also to do with motivation." That was a complex thing and young blacks, particularly after seeing role models such as Linford Christie, might be hungrier to succeed.
The ex-Olympic gold medallist Chris Brasher, however, believes it is all in the genes.
Bannister's theory, page 4 Leading article, page 14
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments