PUBLIC SERVICES Opting-out not improving efficiency
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Doctors, teachers and housing officers believe they are now less accountable to the public they serve as a result of the Government's programme of encouraging schools, hospitals and housing estates to "opt out" of local authority or NHS control. A two-year study by Brunel University, sponsored by the Economic and Social Research Council, is sceptical of claims that opting-out has increased efficiency or made these organisations any more responsive to the public.
The researchers dispute assertions by ministers that things are better outside the control of councils or the National Health Service and argue there is no reliable data to on which to base "before and after" comparisons.
Opting Out and the Experience of Self Management, ESRC, Polaris House, North Star Avenue, Swindon SN2 1UJ.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments